Tuesday, February 21, 2017

sermon - Impossible love

Impossible Love


            The past few weeks, the New Testament readings have been from the Sermon on the Mount.  These are a collections of teaching given by Jesus which call us into a deeper spiritual way of living.  The Beatitudes begin the collection of teachings, and last week, we heard the teaching of the wise man building his house upon the rock.  Jesus is encouraging those that hear his words to also live them out.  Those that hear and do are like the wise man.  Those that hear but do not live out the word, are like the foolish man that builds his house upon the sand. 
            Today, we have another set of teachings, giving guidance to people in how to live specifically within their current cultural context.  Many of us have heard the saying:  an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.  If someone attacks you and it results in you losing an eye or a tooth, the punishment for that person would be the removal of an eye or a tooth.  Right, fair is fair.  You caused this harm to me, so the consequences are the same harm back to you.  We believe in consequences for behavior, but rather than causing the same harm to people, the consequences could be jail time, financial retribution, community service, some form of punishment, but other than the death penalty, we don’t inflict bodily harm back to a person that has wronged us.  
            So, when people come across this passage that we read today, if someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other also, it just doesn’t seem right.  What do you mean, turn the other cheek?  I was just hit, I want justice.  But we have to remember the cultural context.  According to the Companions in Christ study on the Way of Forgiveness, turning the other cheek was not a sign of weakness, but rather a definite act of self.  People struck each other with the left hand, the left hand was considered unclean.  So, by turning your left cheek to someone, they would be forced to strike you with their right hand, which was a sign of being an equal opponent.  So, if a Roman soldier were to strike you, you would want to show that you are an equal and turn the other cheek towards him.  It was an assertion of non-violent power in a time where the people were feeling very powerless.
            If someone sues for your coat give them your cloak as well, and go the second mile are also nonviolent ways of asserting your power in a negative situation.  Depending on your wealth, you may only own a coat and a cloak.  Your coat was your outer garment and the cloak was your inner garment.  You may even use your coat at night for a blanket.  If someone takes your coat, and you give you’re your cloak, you are now naked.  In the cultural context, if someone sees another naked, it brings shame upon the person seeing you.  Roman soldiers were allowed to force people to carry their gear for up to one mile, but no farther.  So, by going the second mile, you were putting a Roman soldier into an awkward situation, and he could be punished by your actions.   All three of these teachings point out the injustices in the current system and expose them.  Giving power to the one being oppressed. 
            Okay, so examining things through the cultural context helps to make these teachings a little more understandable, but what about the next part:  Love your enemy.  This one can really hit home with us in today’s world.  Jesus, we know you are teaching about love, we know and understand that God is love, but this love that you speak of, is just too much, asking us to love our enemies is impossible love.  I cannot love the one that has caused great harm in my life, that has killed thousands of people, that seems to be a source of evil in this world.  I just cannot do it.  So why do you ask it of us? 
            Although Paul writes after the life and death of Jesus, Paul proclaims this:  overcome evil with good.  By at least trying to love our enemies, if at least by trying nonviolent ways of empowerment, we are not retaliating with greater force which is then met with greater force, snowballing the situation into even greater harm than with which it began.  We can play a role is escalating violence or we can play a role in calming the waters.  Remember, one of the Beatitudes is Blessed are the Peacemakers.  We are not to be doormats, allowing others to oppress us or walk all over us, but we have a role in how we allow situations to grow. Right, don’t make a mountain out of a mole hill? 
            So, on this day as we ordain and install our new leadership, these are good teachings for us to all follow, both the leaders of the church and the congregation.  There may be issues that come before us this year where we are ready to speak our mind, but we also need to remember that we are a community, which involves listening to the various voices and discerning what is best for the whole.  Jesus is teaching to a community, a community that he loves, a community that he wants to succeed in the harsh world in which they live. 

            We do want to be open and honest with each other, but we also don’t want to allow conflict to escalate.  It is a good practice to always honor each other, listen with respect, and agree to disagree.  

No comments:

Post a Comment